1 April 2022 | Hybrid Colloquium

CfA: Does Early Modern Philosophy Need Leo Strauss?

To what extent many important figures in the history of philosophy implicitly advanced secularisation while explicitly claiming to defend or reform religion?
Registration is closed
Registration opens 28 Feb, 01:00
CfA: Does Early Modern Philosophy Need Leo Strauss?

Time & Location

1 April 2022
Hybrid Colloquium

About the Event

Leo Strauss is well known for his controversial theory of esotericism – his suggestion that many important figures in the history of philosophy presented their thought in an intentionally misleading or deceptive fashion. In particular, the early modern philosophers such as Hobbes and Spinoza would be held to deliberately conceal their views as part of a strategy to avoid persecution while realizing their key political aim: the promotion of secularization or “critique of revealed religion”, as Strauss defined the Radical Enlightenment in his early book Spinoza’s Critique of Religion.  Despite numerous criticisms of Strauss’s “reading between the lines”, the method seems to inspire some of the recent scholarship on the Enlightenment, for example, the evaluation of Spinoza or Hobbes as essentially atheistic (or anti-religious) and materialist thinkers.

During the colloquium, we would like to address such questions as:

  • Can historians of early modern philosophy still benefit from the Straussian hermeneutical approach, and if so, then in what way? 
  • Are there valid reasons for maintaining the distinction between the content of a philosophical theory and the way its author would conceptualize it?
  •  Given that there were venues for distributing subversive ideas in the late 17th and throughout the 18th centuries (known as clandestine literature), is it legitimate to attribute them to authors who did not embrace such ideas or even rejected them? 
  • Can “reading between the lines” adequately capture the intention of the interpreted authors, or does it rather consist in illicitly imposing the interpreter’s own view on the text s/he studies? 
  • Is the task of the intellectual historian or the historian of philosophy to adequately render the way in which the interpreted author would represent his/her philosophical position, or should s/he rather reconstruct the position from the perspective of his/her own times? 
  • As historians of ideas and philosophy, do we have to compromise between historical accuracy and relevance for contemporary readers?

Contributions addressing these – and related – questions are welcome. Abstracts not exceeding 350 words should be sent to Anna Tomaszewska (anna.tomaszewska@uj.edu.pl), William Wood (williamcarroz@gmail.com) or Hasse Hämäläinen (hasse.hamalainen@uj.edu.pl) by 10 February 2022. Notification of acceptance: 20 February 2022.

Share This Event

By submitting this form, I give consent for my personal data to be processed in matters pertaining to: registration for the purposes of participation in the seminar of the research group Enlightenment and Religion at the Institute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, in accordance with the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 with regard to the processing of personal data and in accordance with the information clause attached to my consent.

In accordance with Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data (…) (“General Regulations”) the Jagiellonian University informs that, the administrator of your personal data is the Jagiellonian University 24 Gołębia Street, 31-007 Krakow. A Data Protection Officer has been appointed by the Jagiellonian University who is based at 24 Gołębia Street, 31-007 Krakow, room nr 5. The Officer can be contacted via e-mail: iod@uj.edu.pl or by phone – 12 663 12 25. Your personal data will be processed for the purpose of the seminar on the basis of registration. Providing personal data is voluntary. However, it is obligatory for your registration to be valid. The recipients of your personal data will be the team of the research project Between Secularization and Reform (grant no. UMO-2018/31/B/HS1/02050). Your personal data might be made available to third parties who are other participants of the seminar meetings. Your personal data will be retained for the duration of the project. You have the right to: access the data and demand its rectification, deletion, processing restrictions, transfer the data, object to the processing of data, withdraw your consent at any time in cases and under the conditions stipulated in “General Regulations”. The withdrawal of consent shall result in the inability to participate in the events of the project. The withdrawal of consent may be sent by email to religious.rationalism@iphils.uj.edu.pl or in person at the Institute of Philosophy, Grodzka 52, 31-044 Kraków, Room 26. You have the right to file a complaint with The President,  Personal Data Protection Office (UODO) if you consider the processing of your personal data to be in violation of the provisions of the “General Regulations”.